Did Assad use Sarin gas?

James Mattis, the US secretary of defense, in a shocking statement admitted that his country has no evidence that Assad used the banned Sarin gas on his people in Syria.

Previously, both the United States and its NATO allies had blamed Assad and the Syrian army – and on some occasions Russia as well – for using Sarin gas in Ghouta and Khan Shikhoun tragedies in 2013 and 2017 respectively. Mattis has now said on record that no such evidence of previous accusations exists.

The US had also previously rejected observations by chemical weapons experts who opined that the Sarin munitions used in Syria were not consistent with state-level quality Sarin gas. Ironically, the US has historically relied on ‘evidence’ and ‘testimonies’ of White Helmets, a first responder group that is now considered a controversial party in the Syrian conflict.

It is also observed that in dire attempts to overthrow Assad, the US has not only spent billions of dollars but may have also tried to influence United Nations inquiries into use of chemical weapons in Syria. This was witnessed when Carla Del Ponte, a member of the joint investigative team, had to withdraw from a UN joint investigation in Syria in 2017 as a protest, accusing the investigative body of not investigating into US-allied ‘rebels’.

Ian Wilkie – a lawyer and a former veteran – while writing for Newsweek also strongly criticised the US and its desperation to overthrow Assad. “America’s credibility was damaged by Colin Powell at the United Nations in 2003 falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having mobile anthrax laboratories. Fast forward to 2017 and we encounter Nikki Haley in an uncomfortably similar situation at the U.N. Security Council calling for action against yet another non-Western head-of-state based on weak, unsubstantiated evidence. Now Secretary Mattis has added fuel to the WMD propaganda doubters’ fire by retroactively calling into question the rationale for an American cruise missile strike”, writes Wilkie.

As Wilkie suggests, the US is trying to repeat a similar mistake – albeit an intentional one – that it committed in Iraq in 2003. What makes this episode further shocking is the fact that the US has still not learnt from its mistakes; with glaring failures in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

1 comment

  1. Bashar Al Assad is neither Asif Zardari nor Nawaz Sharif who would fall to Indian PsyOps and readily agree to send DG ISI or MI to meet the Indian team. Balancing one’s perception in the eyes of world public by countering the threat diligently. In PsyOps anything or everything is possible against the opponent but if it ricochets then good luck to you.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: